Washington, D.C. – As COVID-19 continues to spread to prisoners and staff at federal prisons across the country and the death rate rises, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) and Subcommittee on Crime
Chairwoman Karen Bass (D-CA) sent a letter to U.S. Attorney General William Barr to demand answers and regular, public briefings regarding the handling of COVID-19 in federal prisons and the implementation of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security
Act (CARES Act). Nadler and Bass have written to Barr on three prior occasions regarding coronavirus in federal prisons. To date, the Members have not received adequate responses.
In today’s letter,
the Members write, “Although 789 prisoners throughout the 122 BOP facilities have recently been released, these individuals represent 0.0045 percent of the 175,000 men and women currently in BOP’s care. Social distancing will not
be accomplished with these meager numbers, and the lives of prisoners and staff are in jeopardy. Your staff has indicated that, as of April 7, 2020, there were 456 prisoners in isolation and 3,850 prisoners in quarantine in BOP facilities across the
country, and 193 people quarantined in residential reentry centers. These statistics underscore the need to act. As the unfortunate and alarming situations at Oakdale and a growing number of other BOP facilities indicate, the degree and speed of
your actions must be commensurate with the urgency and scope of the threat.”
On March 12, 2020, Chairman Nadler sent a letter to U.S. Attorney General William Barr requesting information concerning the Department of Justice’s handling of coronavirus and the health and safety of those imprisoned and working in federal
prisons. After not receiving a response, Chairman Nadler and Subcommittee Chairwoman Bass renewed this request and sent a second letter to
U.S. Attorney General William Barr. The Department of Justice responded on March 21, 2020.
On March 30, 2020, Chairman Nadler and Subcommittee Chairwoman
Bass sent a letter to Attorney General Barr urging him to use the authority granted under the CARES Act to protect the most vulnerable prisoners
and those working in federal prisons from coronavirus. On April 3, 2020, Attorney General Barr issued a memorandum related to the COVID-19 pandemic that triggers expanded authority under the CARES Act to transfer prisoners to home confinement in several of
the hardest hit federal prisons. Chairman Nadler applauded this move as a positive step in the right direction and urged swift and appropriate use of this authority. Since the memorandum was issued, the death and infection rates in federal prisons have
Full text of today’s letter is available here and below.
April 10, 2020
The Honorable William P. Barr
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20530
Attorney General Barr:
We would like to begin by acknowledging the steps you and Bureau of Prisons (BOP) Director Michael Carvajal have taken in recent days to release 789 prisoners from BOP custody, but we must also
express that the extent of your actions in response to this crisis to date are inadequate given the threat posed by COVID-19 and that there are approximately 175,000 individuals in your custody. Unfortunately, since the last time we wrote to you, there
have been at least eight deaths in BOP custody and there are at least three BOP facilities—FCI Oakdale, FCI Elkton, and FCI Danbury—that are experiencing “significant levels of infection.” A report from Oakdale published
on April 9, 2020 in the Washington Post paints a particularly devastating picture:
The virus is festering at Oakdale as older inmates and prisoners with serious medical conditions live among
the general population. Prisoners, fearing they may be abandoned in an isolation cell and left for dead, are not reporting their symptoms. Prison staff walk the grounds, often without masks and gloves, failing to observe social distancing with
either inmates or themselves.
We urge swift action to address the outbreaks in these facilities—and to get ahead of the curve to prevent similar tragedies in other BOP facilities around the country. The
lives of prisoners and staff are on the line.
On April 3, 2020, you issued a memorandum recognizing these emergency circumstances and directing the BOP to move vulnerable prisoners into home confinement, with
due “dispatch.” We encourage you, once again, to be as expansive as you can be regarding release and to ensure that the BOP is acting as quickly as possible system-wide, not just to react to outbreaks, on a facility-by-facility basis.
We note that all eight of the deaths in BOP custody, recorded as of today, have involved prisoners with “long-term, pre-existing medical conditions” who were housed in low-security facilities. This raises the question of why, if BOP was aware
that these low-security prisoners had long-term health conditions, it did not see fit to take action concerning these individuals before it was too late. BOP must do better than this.
We write again
now because we continue to be concerned about information that we have received, coming from within BOP facilities. We ask the questions below in an effort to understand what has been done, and is being done, to abate the spread of COVID-19 in BOP.
Please provide answers to the questions that follow, in the most expedited manner possible.
(1) As a general matter, before President Trump’s declaration of a national
emergency, how many prisoners in BOP custody were scheduled for release in 2020? How many were scheduled for release in the six months following the President’s declaration?
Of the prisoners who have died in BOP custody, were any of them under review for release under the expanded home confinement authority of the CARES Act, or under any authority available to the Attorney General or the Director of the BOP? If not, why
(3) As noted above, your April 3, 2020 memorandum directs the Director of the BOP to move prisoners who are “vulnerable” into home confinement, with “dispatch.”
It also refers to Oakdale, Elkton, and Danbury as experiencing “significant levels of infection.”
a. Have you provided guidance to
the Director of the BOP as to who is a “vulnerable” prisoner? If so, please provide that to us.
b. Have you provided guidance to the Director
as to what kind of time frame he has to accomplish this movement of prisoners? In effect, what is due “dispatch”?
c. Besides Oakdale,
Elkton, and Danbury, which other facilities are currently experiencing “significant levels of infection”? How is this standard defined?
(4) How many vulnerable
prisoners are currently housed at Oakdale, at Elkton, and at Danbury?
(5) At the present time, do you know how many vulnerable prisoners are housed system-wide in BOP?
If you do not have a precise number, do you have an estimate?
(6) Reports from inside the Oakdale facility indicate that there is a continuing lack of availability of personal
hygiene products and that general sanitation is lacking.
a. Please provide specific information about the amount of soap that is currently available
per prisoner at Oakdale, Elkton, and Danbury.
b. With regards to soap, please indicate whether this is liquid soap or bars of soap. Are individual
soap dispensers available? Are prisoners expected to share bars of soap?
c. Are individual hand sanitizer products available? If so, in
d. Are hand towels being made available to prisoners at the three facilities? If so, in what amounts per facility?
(7) Is BOP proactively dispensing personal protective equipment (PPE) to vulnerable prisoners? If not, is BOP entertaining requests for PPE from prisoners who have specific health concerns? What about
requests for additional personal hygiene products from such prisoners?
(8) At the present time, is hot water widely available at Oakdale, Elkton, and Danbury? If not,
(9) How many shower stalls are available per number of inmates at each of the three facilities? Is tiered showering being enforced to ensure social distancing?
How frequently are shower stalls being cleaned and by whom?
(10) How frequently is laundry done at each of these facilities? How are items for laundering being collected?
(11) What specific measures are being taken to ensure that quarantine procedures are safe at Oakdale, Elkton, and Danbury? For example:
a. Is showering segregated for prisoners in quarantine?
b. How is food being distributed to quarantined prisoners?
(12) The CDC recently updated its recommendations to include “wearing cloth face coverings in public settings where other social distancing measures are
difficult to maintain...especially in areas of significant community-based transmission.”
a. Are any masks, or cloth face coverings currently being
made available to prisoners and staff at Oakdale, Elkton, and Danbury? If not, when do you expect that these will be made available, per the CDC’s recommendation?
It masks or cloth face coverings are being made available at the one, two, or all three of these facilities, how frequently are prisoners and staff being provided with new masks, or in the case of cloth face coverings, how many are being issued per prisoner
and what kind of instructions are being provided to prisoners to keep them clean?
(13) Besides masks and/or cloth faced coverings, is any other PPE being distributed at
Oakdale, Elkton, and Danbury? For staff? For prisoners?
(14) How are the facilities currently addressing requests for release to home confinement?
Or administrative requests for furloughs? How about grievance requests? How many of each such requests have been received at each facility since March 13, 2020?
are Oakdale, Elkton, and Danbury addressing communication with family and friends of prisoners, who are on the outside?
(16) Reporting indicates that social distancing is not being
practiced in BOP facilities because of the numbers of prisoners in custody. Even with masks or cloth face coverings, CDC guidance is still for individuals to remain six feet apart from each other.
a. In relation to Oakdale, Elkton, and Danbury, what square-footage of living space is available per inmate?
Does the layout of these facilities permit six-foot distancing between prisoners who are currently housed at the facilities?
c. At each of these facilities,
how far apart are bunks from each other?
d. At each of these facilities, how far apart are the bunks for those in quarantine?
(17) Reports emerged last week that a correctional officer at Oakdale, while wearing only gloves as PPE, transported a prisoner on March 19, 2020 to a local community hospital for tests. Two days later, the tests
came back positive for COVID-19 and the prisoner subsequently died. The correctional officer was in contact with the prisoner for several hours and, although the officer expected to be ordered to self-quarantine for 14 days after the test came back
positive, he was apparently ordered to return to work. At the time of these events, what guidance was being given to correctional officers for medical transportation of prisoners who displayed COVID-19 symptoms?
(18) Because of the large numbers of infected staff and prisoners at the three facilities, how is BOP handling gaps in staffing? What kind of contingency plans exist for staffing if multiple other
facilities simultaneously reach the levels of infection being experienced in Oakdale, Elkton, and Danbury?
(19) What testing and treatment protocols have been implemented by BOP
as facilities experience “significant levels of infection”?
Although 789 prisoners throughout the 122 BOP facilities have recently been released, these individuals represent 0.0045 percent of the 175,000
men and women currently in BOP’s care. To address the crowded conditions in these prisons, social distancing will not be accomplished with these meager numbers, and the lives of prisoners and staff are in jeopardy. Your staff has indicated
that, as of April 7, 2020, there were 456 prisoners in isolation and 3,850 prisoners in quarantine in BOP facilities across the country, and 193 people quarantined in residential reentry centers. These statistics underscore the need to act. As
the unfortunate and alarming situations at Oakdale and a growing number of other BOP facilities indicate, the degree and speed of your actions must be commensurate with the urgency and scope of the threat. We urge you to make full use of your authorities
to respond, including the expanded use of home confinement under the recently-enacted CARES Act.
In addition, the public and the families of individuals in BOP custody deserve transparency with respect
to what is taking place in these facilities and the actions you are taking to respond to this crisis. Therefore, we ask that the BOP provide regular, public briefings on these issues.